Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18271 - 18280 of 29942 for des.
Search results 18271 - 18280 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of deficient performance and prejudice. Id. We determine both de novo. See id. We are not persuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463882 - 2021-12-22
of deficient performance and prejudice. Id. We determine both de novo. See id. We are not persuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463882 - 2021-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a hearing presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. DISCUSSION ¶11 At issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252538 - 2020-01-22
to a hearing presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. DISCUSSION ¶11 At issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252538 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
Margaret R. Cierzan v. Jessica Kriegel
. Standard of Review ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5227 - 2017-09-19
. Standard of Review ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5227 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frank P. Howard
to the present case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schulz v. Ystad, 155 Wis.2d 574, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8790 - 2005-03-31
to the present case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schulz v. Ystad, 155 Wis.2d 574, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8790 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 139
judgments are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21
judgments are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21
State v. Richard R. Yakes
court’s factual findings, we review de novo the constitutional significance of those facts. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13646 - 2005-03-31
court’s factual findings, we review de novo the constitutional significance of those facts. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13646 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sean M. Daley
with a statutory interpretation question, which we review de novo. See State v. DeLain, 2005 WI 52, ¶11, 280 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24775 - 2006-05-30
with a statutory interpretation question, which we review de novo. See State v. DeLain, 2005 WI 52, ¶11, 280 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24775 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
, who have already exhausted their direct appeals is an issue of law that we decide de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5544 - 2017-09-19
, who have already exhausted their direct appeals is an issue of law that we decide de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5544 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Clinton L. Duhm
that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6098 - 2017-09-19
that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6098 - 2017-09-19