Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18271 - 18280 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18271 - 18280 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation subject to de novo review. State v. Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622237 - 2023-02-14
restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation subject to de novo review. State v. Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622237 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
Loss Prevention Systems v. Alpha Omega Security, Inc.
met. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13268 - 2017-09-21
met. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13268 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Fontaine L. Baker
mixed questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19095 - 2017-09-21
mixed questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19095 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶14, 343 Wis. 2d 43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239679 - 2019-04-30
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶14, 343 Wis. 2d 43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239679 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
State v. John S.
procedures were not constitutionally infirm. ¶16 Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
procedures were not constitutionally infirm. ¶16 Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13176 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13176 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Phillips, 2009 WI App 179, ¶17, 322 Wis. 2d 576, 778 N.W.2d 157. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
.” State v. Phillips, 2009 WI App 179, ¶17, 322 Wis. 2d 576, 778 N.W.2d 157. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Vogel
of law this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14683 - 2017-09-21
of law this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Mach v. Allison, 2003 WI App 11, ¶14, 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163454 - 2017-09-21
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Mach v. Allison, 2003 WI App 11, ¶14, 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163454 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony John Doty
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however: “the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7511 - 2017-09-20
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however: “the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7511 - 2017-09-20