Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18271 - 18280 of 29827 for des.
Search results 18271 - 18280 of 29827 for des.
State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
Sauk County v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14852 - 2005-03-31
We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14852 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an “end-around” the statutory time period to appeal and de facto extend that time period by several months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141811 - 2015-05-19
an “end-around” the statutory time period to appeal and de facto extend that time period by several months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141811 - 2015-05-19
Clark Wolff v. Grant County Board of Adjustment
which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 217 Wis.2d 640, 644, 579 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14581 - 2005-03-31
which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 217 Wis.2d 640, 644, 579 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to undisputed facts is a legal question that we review de novo, and we will follow their lead. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182877 - 2017-09-21
to undisputed facts is a legal question that we review de novo, and we will follow their lead. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182877 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard R. Yakes
). If we accept the trial court’s factual findings, we review de novo the constitutional significance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13646 - 2017-09-21
). If we accept the trial court’s factual findings, we review de novo the constitutional significance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Virtis A.
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667870 - 2023-06-13
decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667870 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
WI APP 16
review de novo. State v. Joseph E.G., 2001 WI App 29, ¶4, 240 Wis. 2d 481, 623
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34903 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. State v. Joseph E.G., 2001 WI App 29, ¶4, 240 Wis. 2d 481, 623
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34903 - 2014-09-15
George B. Furey, Jr. v. Clarine A. Furey
hearing on October 29, 2004, the circuit court considered de novo the issues of physical placement, child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21169 - 2006-01-31
hearing on October 29, 2004, the circuit court considered de novo the issues of physical placement, child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21169 - 2006-01-31