Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18271 - 18280 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 18271 - 18280 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 50%. Hernandez’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32142 - 2014-09-15
, 50%. Hernandez’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32142 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., Inc. (“Gagliano Co.”) appeals an order of the trial court denying its postverdict motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242977 - 2019-07-02
., Inc. (“Gagliano Co.”) appeals an order of the trial court denying its postverdict motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242977 - 2019-07-02
State v. Boon Savanh
an interpreter at trial that he had seen Savanh and Vongrasamy, “ha[ve] cocaine and sell[] cocaine … every day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19825 - 2005-12-11
an interpreter at trial that he had seen Savanh and Vongrasamy, “ha[ve] cocaine and sell[] cocaine … every day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19825 - 2005-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, entered following a jury trial, for three counts each of kidnapping, second-degree sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83178 - 2012-05-29
of conviction, entered following a jury trial, for three counts each of kidnapping, second-degree sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83178 - 2012-05-29
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
under WIS. STAT. § 980.01(7). ¶3 A jury trial took place on February 12 and 13, 2002. Two experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5230 - 2017-09-19
under WIS. STAT. § 980.01(7). ¶3 A jury trial took place on February 12 and 13, 2002. Two experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5230 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
time. They also assert they are entitled to a new trial based on an improper closing remark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85907 - 2012-08-13
time. They also assert they are entitled to a new trial based on an improper closing remark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85907 - 2012-08-13
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Scheiwe
by the statute of limitations or the doctrine of laches. He also seeks a new trial on grounds that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3544 - 2017-09-19
by the statute of limitations or the doctrine of laches. He also seeks a new trial on grounds that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3544 - 2017-09-19
State v. John Foster Fant
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Fant argues: (1) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Fant argues: (1) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stephen Dye
presented at trial was insufficient to support the State’s charge that he was in possession of more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11836 - 2017-09-21
presented at trial was insufficient to support the State’s charge that he was in possession of more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11836 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael L. Scheiwe
a new trial on grounds that the trial court erroneously admitted hearsay testimony concerning Scheiwe’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3544 - 2005-03-31
a new trial on grounds that the trial court erroneously admitted hearsay testimony concerning Scheiwe’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3544 - 2005-03-31