Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18271 - 18280 of 38489 for t's.

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
, 2025 2024AP000817-CRNM State v. Kavi T. Fix 4 Dane PDF Page 1 of 1 Search again Court of Appeals
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=11/20/2025&end_date=11/20/2025¬iceTypeCode=SMD

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
District County Select/view Jan 08, 2026 2025AP001972 Columbia County v. T. R. B. 4 Columbia PDF Jan 08
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=01/08/2026&end_date=01/08/2026

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
of America [Recommended for Publication] 1 Milwaukee PDF Jan 21, 2026 2023AP000600 State v. Jacob T
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=01/21/2026&end_date=01/21/2026

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
District County Select/view Jan 27, 2026 2024AP002338-CR State v. Daylin T. Bridges 1 Milwaukee PDF Jan
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=01/27/2026&end_date=01/27/2026

Debbra MacDonald v. American National Property and Casualty Company
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Door County: d. t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5006 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael A. Curry
. The supreme court concluded that “[t]he record does not suggest Reitter was confused by Deputy Sipher’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7606 - 2005-03-31

William E. Johnson v. Donna M. Johnson
that “[t]he starting point for consideration of maintenance is an equal division of disposable income.” We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13119 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of fact). “[T]he trier of fact is allowed to accept or reject inconsistent testimony.” State v. Curiel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33777 - 2008-08-18

State v. Cleansoils Wisconsin, Inc.
between the same or different parties. See Michelle T. v. Crozier, 173 Wis. 2d 681, 687, 495 N.W.2d 327
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15559 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald J. Dockry
, that there was probable cause to arrest Dockry based upon “[t]he allegation that the defendant was drunk[4] plus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2863 - 2005-03-31