Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18281 - 18290 of 29942 for des.
Search results 18281 - 18290 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 634; State v. Harvey, 139 Wis. 2d 353, 376, 407 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76078 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 634; State v. Harvey, 139 Wis. 2d 353, 376, 407 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the property in 2009, such that he did not violate either ordinance. We review de novo the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213616 - 2018-05-30
of the property in 2009, such that he did not violate either ordinance. We review de novo the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213616 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Lloyd Edwin Sellers
the sufficiency of Miranda warnings and whether they were voluntarily waived de novo. State v. Santiago, 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10976 - 2017-09-19
the sufficiency of Miranda warnings and whether they were voluntarily waived de novo. State v. Santiago, 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10976 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
court’s interpretation of a statute de novo. Robin K. v. Lamanda M., 2006 WI 68, ¶13, 291 Wis. 2d 333
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32321 - 2014-09-15
court’s interpretation of a statute de novo. Robin K. v. Lamanda M., 2006 WI 68, ¶13, 291 Wis. 2d 333
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32321 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Courtyard Condominium Association, Inc. v. Barbara Draper
two or more statutes also presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2771 - 2017-09-19
two or more statutes also presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2771 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2007AP2584 Cir. Ct. No. 2007CV26
sought de novo judicial review contending that the transcript was not a “public record
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34696 - 2014-09-15
sought de novo judicial review contending that the transcript was not a “public record
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34696 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard John Vernon
at ¶15. “We then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” Ibid. We discuss the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4066 - 2017-09-20
at ¶15. “We then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” Ibid. We discuss the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4066 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI 26
findings of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35941 - 2014-09-15
findings of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35941 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Claus Bruestle
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7455 - 2017-09-20
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7455 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to our de novo review. See State v. Cooper, 2003 WI App 227, ¶9, 267 Wis. 2d 886, 672 N.W.2d 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265585 - 2020-06-25
to our de novo review. See State v. Cooper, 2003 WI App 227, ¶9, 267 Wis. 2d 886, 672 N.W.2d 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265585 - 2020-06-25