Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18281 - 18290 of 69092 for he.
Search results 18281 - 18290 of 69092 for he.
State v. David W. Stokes
with the Parrs, who were his next-door neighbors. Stokes contended that he shot the Parrs in self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7784 - 2005-03-31
with the Parrs, who were his next-door neighbors. Stokes contended that he shot the Parrs in self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7784 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
, 244 Wis. 2d 438, 628 N.W.2d 351. Harman's license was suspended based on the determination that he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17562 - 2005-03-31
, 244 Wis. 2d 438, 628 N.W.2d 351. Harman's license was suspended based on the determination that he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17562 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that Michael was largely not credible and that an “air of suspicion” surrounded everything he said owing to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88878 - 2012-11-06
that Michael was largely not credible and that an “air of suspicion” surrounded everything he said owing to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88878 - 2012-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Cynthia A. Provo
, Provo’s trial attorney testified that although he did not specifically remember whether Provo had read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5600 - 2017-09-19
, Provo’s trial attorney testified that although he did not specifically remember whether Provo had read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Johnson filed two similar responses, the second because he “never got a response back” from this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131671 - 2017-09-21
Johnson filed two similar responses, the second because he “never got a response back” from this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131671 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
(2)(a) (2009-10),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[2] He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69297 - 2011-08-08
(2)(a) (2009-10),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[2] He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69297 - 2011-08-08
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2003-04).[1] He appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order[2] denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
) (2003-04).[1] He appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order[2] denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and a new sentencing factor. He also argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235227 - 2019-02-20
and a new sentencing factor. He also argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235227 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
included theft of jewelry from D.H. by intentionally deceiving her using a representation he knew
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424025 - 2021-09-15
included theft of jewelry from D.H. by intentionally deceiving her using a representation he knew
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424025 - 2021-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
employee as he fled that he was going to “come back for [her].” The accomplice confessed to the first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93373 - 2014-09-15
employee as he fled that he was going to “come back for [her].” The accomplice confessed to the first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93373 - 2014-09-15