Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18281 - 18290 of 61136 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 18281 - 18290 of 61136 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Steven Buckingham
for plea withdrawal and sentence modification. Buckingham claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31
for plea withdrawal and sentence modification. Buckingham claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that his trial lawyer gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64979 - 2014-09-15
, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that his trial lawyer gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion. Smith claims that: (1) his trial lawyer was ineffective; and (2) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33306 - 2014-09-15
motion. Smith claims that: (1) his trial lawyer was ineffective; and (2) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33306 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and as to Amcore’s allegedly false representations that they claim induced them to sell, a decision they soon came
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77594 - 2012-02-07
and as to Amcore’s allegedly false representations that they claim induced them to sell, a decision they soon came
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77594 - 2012-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Joseph F. Jiles
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Jiles claims that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4841 - 2017-09-19
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Jiles claims that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4841 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
reconsideration. Ankerson claims that the trial court erred because there were genuine issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27301 - 2006-12-04
reconsideration. Ankerson claims that the trial court erred because there were genuine issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27301 - 2006-12-04
State v. Rick A. Holtz
was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial. A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17826 - 2005-04-26
was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial. A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17826 - 2005-04-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for failing to raise that claim. Upon review of the briefs and No. 2022AP18-CR 2 record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680940 - 2023-07-25
for failing to raise that claim. Upon review of the briefs and No. 2022AP18-CR 2 record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680940 - 2023-07-25
CA Blank Order
also appears to be claiming that his plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103136 - 2013-10-17
also appears to be claiming that his plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103136 - 2013-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
Seymour claims he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. This court’s review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33008 - 2008-06-16
Seymour claims he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. This court’s review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33008 - 2008-06-16