Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18291 - 18300 of 29714 for des.

Town of Dunkirk v. City of Stoughton
requirements is a question of law, which we review de novo. Schaefer, 2002 WI 18, ¶15. Whether a defect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4849 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ronald L. Monarch
of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Slaughter, 200 Wis.2d 190, 196, 546 N.W.2d 490, 493 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15415 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the property in 2009, such that he did not violate either ordinance. We review de novo the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213616 - 2018-05-30

[PDF] Evelyn Hommrich v. Joseph Van Beek
her pleadings liberally. Because our review is de novo, and we apply the standards of § 802.08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12253 - 2017-09-21

County of Langlade v. Michael N. Kaster
to a particular set of facts are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Block Iron & Supply Co., 183 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9748 - 2005-03-31

James H. Gold v. City of Adams
are questions of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3912 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
process is a constitutional issue we decide de novo. State v. Travis, 2013 WI 38, ¶20, 347 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113388 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
for our de novo review. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27153 - 2006-11-15

State v. Keith M. Carey
of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6583 - 2005-03-31

State v. Travis Allen
review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden of proving the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18461 - 2005-06-06