Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18291 - 18300 of 49831 for our.
Search results 18291 - 18300 of 49831 for our.
Douglas County v. Steven Leinweber
decision in Florida v. J.L., 120 S. Ct. 1375, 1378 (2000), the United States Supreme Court vacated our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2224 - 2005-03-31
decision in Florida v. J.L., 120 S. Ct. 1375, 1378 (2000), the United States Supreme Court vacated our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2224 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
strengthens our analysis and does not change the result. No. 2010AP259 5 Maintenance ¶13 Mary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57551 - 2014-09-15
strengthens our analysis and does not change the result. No. 2010AP259 5 Maintenance ¶13 Mary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57551 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
circuit courts have broad discretion to determine the amount and duration of maintenance, our standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29487 - 2007-06-27
circuit courts have broad discretion to determine the amount and duration of maintenance, our standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29487 - 2007-06-27
State v. Delano L. Terrell
of the statute clearly and unambiguously sets forth the legislative intent, it is our duty to apply that intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25920 - 2006-08-29
of the statute clearly and unambiguously sets forth the legislative intent, it is our duty to apply that intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25920 - 2006-08-29
State v. Brian C. Wegner
by the trial judge. Therefore, it is our duty to affirm the sentence on appeal. See McCleary, 49 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
by the trial judge. Therefore, it is our duty to affirm the sentence on appeal. See McCleary, 49 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not proceed further with our analysis. See id., ¶38. For the sake of completeness, however, we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
not proceed further with our analysis. See id., ¶38. For the sake of completeness, however, we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
the motion and dismissed Selgren’s complaint with prejudice. Selgren appeals. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31
the motion and dismissed Selgren’s complaint with prejudice. Selgren appeals. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 In Green, our supreme court clarified that the preliminary showing for an in camera review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379939 - 2021-06-22
. ¶7 In Green, our supreme court clarified that the preliminary showing for an in camera review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379939 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160446 - 2017-09-21
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160446 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
will limit our review to whether there was substantial evidence to support the agency’s decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68570 - 2011-07-25
will limit our review to whether there was substantial evidence to support the agency’s decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68570 - 2011-07-25