Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1831 - 1840 of 4337 for bd.

2008 WI APP 103
v. State Med. Examining Bd., 119 Wis. 2d 168, 194-95, 349 N.W.2d 68 (1984). We review the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33015 - 2008-07-29

[PDF] Microsoft Word - Table2
2020AP000339 Eagle Lake Manor Cmty. Ass’n, Inc. v. Racine Cty. Bd. 07-28-2021 Affirmed of Drainage Comm’r
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482814 - 2022-02-08

Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
questions of law de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11453 - 2005-03-31

Kathleen S. Vitalis v. Daniel J. Vitalis
of the weight and credibility of testimony. See Estate of Wolff v. Town Bd., 156 Wis.2d 588, 598, 457 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11302 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis. 2d 529, 539, 345 N.W.2d 389 (1984). If the legislature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34114 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
) (quoting Nufer v. Village Bd. of Village of Palmayra, 92 Wis.2d 289, 301, 284 N.W.2d 649, 655 (1979
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13416 - 2017-09-21

Alice L. Andrews v. Town of Balsam Lake
a mistaken view of the law would be an erroneous exercise of discretion. See Schaefer v. Potosi Village Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2136 - 2005-03-31

Calumet County Health & Social Services v. Michael J.R.
or she may act accordingly; such notice is a basic requirement of due process. Elections Bd. v. Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4240 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Kenosha Cty. Bd. of Review, 184 Wis. 2d 541, 561, 516 N.W.2d 695 (1994). ¶15 The City argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264673 - 2020-06-16

George M. DeBruin v. Town of Ashippun Board of Review
it to be incorrect. Dempze Cranberry Co. v. Bd. of Review of Biron, 143 Wis.2d 879, 884, 422 N.W.2d 902, 904 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11776 - 2005-03-31