Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1831 - 1840 of 83166 for case code.

COURT OF APPEALS
) to revoke Obriecht’s supervision in multiple criminal cases.[1] Obriecht contends that: (1) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118569 - 2014-07-30

[PDF] Frederick N. Spence v. Marianne A. Cooke
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2598 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14471 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Norman O. Brown v. Stephen Puckett
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2791-LV Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14555 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
criminal cases. 1 Obriecht contends that: (1) he was denied due process at the revocation hearing; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118569 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 21-04 - Comments from Christina J. Gilbert, Senior Youth Policy Counsel, The Gault Center, National Juvenile Defender Center
have been outstanding. We hear about 3,000 juvenile cases in my district. In only two cases did I deem
/supreme/docs/2104commentsgilbert.pdf - 2021-12-23

Mary E. Fazio v. Department of Employee Trust Funds
2002 WI App 127 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2595 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4422 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mary E. Fazio v. Department of Employee Trust Funds
2002 WI App 127 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2595
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4422 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and security deposits have priority over the interests of the Bondholders. Facts ¶2 This case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402815 - 2021-07-30

[PDF] Wisconsin Supreme Court Open Rules Petition Conference
to Judicial Code Review Committee. Rule Petition 12-11: Petition to create a Judicial Code Review
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac111615.pdf - 2015-10-29

State v. John C. Cleveland
privileges for administrative code violations. He contends that (1) the sentence was excessive and imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4224 - 2005-03-31