Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1831 - 1840 of 3972 for davy.
Search results 1831 - 1840 of 3972 for davy.
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
. 12-23-2014 Affirmed 2013AP001349 Bruce T. Davis v. Tim Douma1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134852 - 2015-02-08
. 12-23-2014 Affirmed 2013AP001349 Bruce T. Davis v. Tim Douma1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134852 - 2015-02-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶27, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823; see also Wis. Stat. § 973.15(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34497 - 2008-11-04
. State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶27, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823; see also Wis. Stat. § 973.15(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34497 - 2008-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶26, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823. At the sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592719 - 2022-11-22
v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶26, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823. At the sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592719 - 2022-11-22
State v. Daniel D. Brown
an ambiguous statement. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459 (1994). Instead, he argues that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2490 - 2005-03-31
an ambiguous statement. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459 (1994). Instead, he argues that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2490 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Davis, 2008 WI 71, ¶18, 310 Wis. 2d 583, 751 N.W.2d 332 (questions of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64697 - 2014-09-15
. Davis, 2008 WI 71, ¶18, 310 Wis. 2d 583, 751 N.W.2d 332 (questions of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64697 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and it need not explain why it did not impose a lesser sentence.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶26, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410240 - 2021-08-17
, and it need not explain why it did not impose a lesser sentence.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶26, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410240 - 2021-08-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Neubauer, C.J., Davis, and Dugan, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253654 - 2020-02-12
Neubauer, C.J., Davis, and Dugan, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253654 - 2020-02-12
State v. Leroy H. Hintz
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2809 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2809 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Richard C. Ninneman, Jeffrey O. Davis, Joan M. Harms and Quarles & Brady
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17044 - 2005-03-31
. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Richard C. Ninneman, Jeffrey O. Davis, Joan M. Harms and Quarles & Brady
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17044 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 604 N.W.2d 552. An attached garage clearly is part of the curtilage. State v. Davis, 2011 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182532 - 2017-09-21
, 604 N.W.2d 552. An attached garage clearly is part of the curtilage. State v. Davis, 2011 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182532 - 2017-09-21