Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1831 - 1840 of 57317 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
of the sexual assault allegations.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). The statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82155 - 2012-05-07

[PDF] State v. Scott K. Seal
. No. 02-1352-CR 5 Id. (emphasis added). Seal contends that this statute does not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5270 - 2017-09-19

State v. Scott K. Seal
, in the case of a prison, shall be imprisoned for not more than 3 years or fined not more than $500. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5270 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Appendix in support of motion for reconsideration of 12-22-23 decision and scheduling order
an injunction barring any further use of the Current Plan.”). 2 See also R.170 at 5 (citing same). 3 Id. at 7
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_12291mrcappx.pdf - 2024-01-02

[PDF] Frontsheet
by extending Padilla beyond the deportation context to require advice about Chapter 980 civil commitment. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168449 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Wyatt Daniel Henning
5 Id. 6 Wis. Stat. § 946.49(1)(b). 7 Both Wis. Stat. § 969.02(4) and § 969.03(2) provide
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16625 - 2017-09-21

Thomas G. Butler v. Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
in 1986 could result in catastrophic losses to existing developments. Id. at 29. ¶6 The water level
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25884 - 2006-07-12

[PDF] State v. Louis J. Thornton
be a meaningful one.” Id. at 99. An indigent defendant is constitutionally entitled to the appointment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3733 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
sentences because the sentences are concurrent. See id. The State does not dispute that the sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28306 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 100
a guilty plea.” See id. We review the denial of the defendants’ motion to suppress under a two- part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122771 - 2014-11-11