Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1831 - 1840 of 49813 for our.

[PDF] State v. Ryan D.D.
. Because the court’s oral pronouncement controls, we reverse the dispositional order. Our holding also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12833 - 2017-09-21

State v. James R. Bolstad
. Based upon our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8482 - 2005-03-31

State v. James R. Bolstad
. Based upon our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8484 - 2005-03-31

State v. James R. Bolstad
. Based upon our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8483 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Vincent Angiolo
N.W.2d 923, 926 (Ct. App. 1994). Following our remand, the charges against Angiolo were dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10228 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Vonnie D. Darby
). Because our decision on the penalty enhancement portion of Darby’s sentence affords him relief, we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12767 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
issue on summary judgment is whether Ardyce “harbored” the dog. ¶4 Our supreme court has held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194202 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585654 - 2022-11-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
appeals an order dismissing his habeas petition due to laches. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178114 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, but it applied appropriate factors and its analysis went beyond a mechanistic review. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52029 - 2010-07-12