Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1831 - 1840 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 1831 - 1840 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Donald Odom
motion for postconviction relief. Odom argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25476 - 2017-09-21
motion for postconviction relief. Odom argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25476 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald Odom
motion for postconviction relief. Odom argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25476 - 2006-07-25
motion for postconviction relief. Odom argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25476 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of three counts of sexual assault of a child, three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102958 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of three counts of sexual assault of a child, three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102958 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 120
for a supervisory writ of prohibition, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 809.51 (2009-10),1 to prevent the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87872 - 2014-09-15
for a supervisory writ of prohibition, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 809.51 (2009-10),1 to prevent the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87872 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, following a jury trial, finding him guilty as a party to the crimes of first-degree reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229421 - 2018-12-11
of conviction, following a jury trial, finding him guilty as a party to the crimes of first-degree reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229421 - 2018-12-11
Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South Milwaukee
Bluff claims the trial court erred when it found that there were no compelling equitable reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2831 - 2005-03-31
Bluff claims the trial court erred when it found that there were no compelling equitable reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2831 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with the mistrial. Therefore, we reverse the final judgment and remand with instructions that the trial court enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53413 - 2007-03-19
with the mistrial. Therefore, we reverse the final judgment and remand with instructions that the trial court enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53413 - 2007-03-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for postconviction relief. Wilber argues that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33862 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. Wilber argues that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33862 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33862 - 2008-09-02
that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33862 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial court’s objective bias denied him of his constitutional right to a fair trial and that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762884 - 2024-02-13
trial court’s objective bias denied him of his constitutional right to a fair trial and that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762884 - 2024-02-13