Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18301 - 18310 of 29713 for des.
Search results 18301 - 18310 of 29713 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
(Ct. App. 1999). This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35108 - 2009-01-06
(Ct. App. 1999). This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35108 - 2009-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review questions of law de novo. See Pawlowski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2009 WI 105, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62515 - 2011-04-06
. We review questions of law de novo. See Pawlowski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2009 WI 105, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62515 - 2011-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103408 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103408 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Danbeck v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2001 WI 91, ¶10, 245 Wis. 2d 186, 629 N.W.2d 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54005 - 2010-09-07
de novo. Danbeck v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2001 WI 91, ¶10, 245 Wis. 2d 186, 629 N.W.2d 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54005 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal question that we review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR, 2009 WI App 113, ¶12, 321 Wis. 2d 181, 772
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037089 - 2025-11-18
is a legal question that we review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR, 2009 WI App 113, ¶12, 321 Wis. 2d 181, 772
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037089 - 2025-11-18
State v. Richard W. Hendrickson
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we decide de novo. Id. ¶12 To demonstrate ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3036 - 2005-03-31
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we decide de novo. Id. ¶12 To demonstrate ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3036 - 2005-03-31
Re/Max Realty 100 v. Howard Basso, Jr.
676, 643 N.W.2d 132. The construction of a written contract is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5732 - 2005-03-31
676, 643 N.W.2d 132. The construction of a written contract is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5732 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 44
. Both issues present questions of law that we review de novo. Schulte v. Frazin, 176 Wis. 2d 622, 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28190 - 2007-03-27
. Both issues present questions of law that we review de novo. Schulte v. Frazin, 176 Wis. 2d 622, 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28190 - 2007-03-27
Sauk County v. Aaron J. J.
action to restrict a person’s liberty is a question of constitutional law which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7140 - 2005-03-31
action to restrict a person’s liberty is a question of constitutional law which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7140 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108145 - 2014-02-18
that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108145 - 2014-02-18