Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18311 - 18320 of 29942 for des.
Search results 18311 - 18320 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. The circuit court vacated the original order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078106 - 2026-02-17
a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. The circuit court vacated the original order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078106 - 2026-02-17
2007 WI APP 246
must interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 893.28(2) to undisputed facts, a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30511 - 2007-11-27
must interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 893.28(2) to undisputed facts, a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30511 - 2007-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30193 - 2007-09-10
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30193 - 2007-09-10
[PDF]
State v. Chad J. Knoll
be raised in a restitution proceeding, involve questions of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15739 - 2017-09-21
be raised in a restitution proceeding, involve questions of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15739 - 2017-09-21
State v. Danny C. Eesley
. The standard of review is therefore de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12672 - 2005-03-31
. The standard of review is therefore de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12672 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
LIRC’s legal conclusions de novo; however, we defer to LIRC’s findings of fact “if they are supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537060 - 2022-07-07
LIRC’s legal conclusions de novo; however, we defer to LIRC’s findings of fact “if they are supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537060 - 2022-07-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law for our de novo review. See State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184810 - 2017-09-21
of law for our de novo review. See State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184810 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Universal Foods Corporation v. Elizabeth A. Zande
review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4203 - 2017-09-19
review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4203 - 2017-09-19
2009 WI APP 37
and application of § 973.20 and is therefore a question of law that we determine de novo. State v. Lee, 2008 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35485 - 2011-06-14
and application of § 973.20 and is therefore a question of law that we determine de novo. State v. Lee, 2008 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35485 - 2011-06-14
City of Oshkosh v. Christine K. Palecek-Baerwald
constitutes probable cause is a question of law that the court of appeals will review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5908 - 2005-03-31
constitutes probable cause is a question of law that the court of appeals will review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5908 - 2005-03-31