Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18311 - 18320 of 29821 for des.
Search results 18311 - 18320 of 29821 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Lala, 2009 WI App 137, ¶8, 321 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96858 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Lala, 2009 WI App 137, ¶8, 321 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96858 - 2014-09-15
State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
review de novo. See Craig S.G. v. State, 209 Wis. 2d 65, 68, 561 N.W.2d 807 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Craig S.G. v. State, 209 Wis. 2d 65, 68, 561 N.W.2d 807 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s decision to deny a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870564 - 2024-11-05
the circuit court’s decision to deny a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870564 - 2024-11-05
[PDF]
they are clearly erroneous, and I review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901374 - 2025-01-16
they are clearly erroneous, and I review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901374 - 2025-01-16
Patrick P. Fee v. Board of Review for the Town of Florence
). We review a trial court’s decision to dismiss a complaint de novo. See Town of Eagle v. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5434 - 2005-03-31
). We review a trial court’s decision to dismiss a complaint de novo. See Town of Eagle v. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5434 - 2005-03-31
Hubert Hill v. Paul Zimmerman
) of the statute.[1] The interpretation of § 972.15 presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7964 - 2005-03-31
) of the statute.[1] The interpretation of § 972.15 presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
]he application of constitutional principles to those facts presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195870 - 2017-09-21
]he application of constitutional principles to those facts presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195870 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Travis Allen
. In Wisconsin, however, we review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
. In Wisconsin, however, we review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44860 - 2014-09-15
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44860 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). Whether a defendant has been denied this right is a constitutional issue that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247603 - 2019-10-01
omitted). Whether a defendant has been denied this right is a constitutional issue that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247603 - 2019-10-01