Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18311 - 18320 of 29817 for des.
Search results 18311 - 18320 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Adams filed a timely de novo appeal to the Milwaukee County Circuit Court. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106507 - 2017-09-21
Adams filed a timely de novo appeal to the Milwaukee County Circuit Court. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106507 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rex B. Roberts
is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Berry
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶6 Berry argues that Terrance’s mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶6 Berry argues that Terrance’s mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudicial to the defendant is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 It is well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30973 - 2007-11-27
and prejudicial to the defendant is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 It is well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30973 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the party seeking relief is a question of the law that we review de novo.” State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79020 - 2014-09-15
to the party seeking relief is a question of the law that we review de novo.” State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79020 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We will not upset findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101482 - 2017-09-21
. We will not upset findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101482 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17017 - 2005-03-31
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17017 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Stambaugh
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, is reviewed de novo. See id. ¶11 The sole dispute before us is the constitutionality of the warrantless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36907 - 2009-06-24
, is reviewed de novo. See id. ¶11 The sole dispute before us is the constitutionality of the warrantless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36907 - 2009-06-24
John Doe 67A v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
is whether the “discovery rule” applies. The trial court held that it did not. On our de novo review, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6526 - 2005-03-31
is whether the “discovery rule” applies. The trial court held that it did not. On our de novo review, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6526 - 2005-03-31