Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18321 - 18330 of 58303 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not been turned over to the State prior to trial. Davis contended that his picture or a viewing of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234705 - 2019-02-12

State v. Shannon L. Labine
grounds: (1) the trial court erred by admitting “other acts” evidence, and (2) the juvenile court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8103 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
a reasonable trial strategy, and any error that occurred did not negatively impact Jorgensen. The circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33040 - 2008-06-12

[PDF] WI 60
not ineffective but instead had made decisions based upon a reasonable trial strategy, and any error
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33040 - 2014-09-15

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Roger H. Schuett
the Wisconsin Consumer Act (WCA). The customers claim: (1) that they prevailed at the trial court level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12206 - 2005-03-31

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Frank M. Kett
the Wisconsin Consumer Act (WCA). The customers claim: (1) that they prevailed at the trial court level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12138 - 2005-03-31

Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
of the termination of parental rights proceeding (TPR), the trial court failed to consider two statutory factors: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7245 - 2005-03-31

Greendale Education Assocation v. Greendale School District
argues that the trial court erred when it vacated the arbitration award and found that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4651 - 2005-03-31

Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
of the termination of parental rights proceeding (TPR), the trial court failed to consider two statutory factors: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7244 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
concludes that trial counsel was not ineffective because the specific motion to strike that O’Boyle claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107713 - 2017-09-21