Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18331 - 18340 of 29714 for des.

[PDF] State v. Kevin L. Paulson
, determining de novo whether a constitutional violation has occurred. See State v. Martwick, 2000 WI 5, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18026 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
performance was deficient and prejudicial to the defendant is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30973 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo. Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45, ¶14, 317 Wis. 2d 288, 766 N.W.2d 517. Upon review, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74678 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103408 - 2013-10-28

State v. Aaron Evans
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Schmaling, 198 Wis. 2d 756, 760, 543 N.W.2d 555 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15946 - 2005-03-31

Alison Laux v. Leonard Lewins
, an appellate court can make a de novo determination as to whether the statute was correctly applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2254 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 102
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully, 2005 WI 100, ¶25
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75496 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was or appeared biased is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶23
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219736 - 2018-09-26

COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102929 - 2013-10-14

COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07