Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18341 - 18350 of 69801 for he.
Search results 18341 - 18350 of 69801 for he.
City of Sheboygan v. Mary Nell Matzdorf
Clark that he had heard a crash from inside his residence and then, upon looking out of his window, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12760 - 2005-03-31
Clark that he had heard a crash from inside his residence and then, upon looking out of his window, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12760 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
and Mark Krumplitsch’s brother-in-law, testified that he observed Krumplitsch and Porth burning wooden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4539 - 2017-09-20
and Mark Krumplitsch’s brother-in-law, testified that he observed Krumplitsch and Porth burning wooden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4539 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James L. Wright
with intent to deliver and obstruction. Both charges included repeat offender penalty enhancers. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5981 - 2017-09-19
with intent to deliver and obstruction. Both charges included repeat offender penalty enhancers. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5981 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. He asserts the criminal complaint was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59567 - 2014-09-15
. He asserts the criminal complaint was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59567 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence of intoxication because, he asserts, the police subjected him to a “de facto” arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110871 - 2017-09-21
to suppress evidence of intoxication because, he asserts, the police subjected him to a “de facto” arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110871 - 2017-09-21
State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
husband and Mark Krumplitsch’s brother-in-law, testified that he observed Krumplitsch and Porth burning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4539 - 2005-03-31
husband and Mark Krumplitsch’s brother-in-law, testified that he observed Krumplitsch and Porth burning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4539 - 2005-03-31
Jennifer Louise Kunert v. Lyle Herman Kunert
a gun on me," and in the struggle to get the gun away from her, he pushed her through a wall.[3] Lyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11604 - 2005-03-31
a gun on me," and in the struggle to get the gun away from her, he pushed her through a wall.[3] Lyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11604 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
counsel’s effectiveness. He first challenges postconviction counsel’s failure to raise the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33898 - 2014-09-15
counsel’s effectiveness. He first challenges postconviction counsel’s failure to raise the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33898 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Cynthia M. Stocking v. James Stocking
. At that time, Cynthia moved into an apartment in Milwaukee. James remained in the River Hills home that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14236 - 2014-09-15
. At that time, Cynthia moved into an apartment in Milwaukee. James remained in the River Hills home that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14236 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
story, he was lying, and his account did not match the physical evidence. Czysz argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161065 - 2017-09-21
story, he was lying, and his account did not match the physical evidence. Czysz argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161065 - 2017-09-21