Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18351 - 18360 of 40298 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
noticed a strong new car smell and a faint smell of intoxicants coming from Strasen’s vehicle. He asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106876 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a basis for reversing the judgment, a new trial would be ordered regardless of the result of the Clappes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61888 - 2011-03-28

State v. Charles R. Seibel
Robert Baldwin of the City of New Holstein Police Department observed a vehicle weaving within its lane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6857 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Clyde Sukanen v. School District of Monroe
, extending it through the 1999-2000 school year. Sukanen signed the new contract. On August 30, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4415 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Abdulahi filed a motion to modify his sentence based on the existence of a new factor. Specifically
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051205 - 2025-12-16

COURT OF APPEALS
§§ 943.20(1)(d) and (3)(bf), 939.61 (2005-06). In a postconviction motion, Valoe sought a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41826 - 2009-10-05

State v. Gary E. Andrashko
clearly did not permit the trial court to find that sufficient reason existed to consider the new motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8579 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Harrison M. Marcum
was ineffective; (3) and he should receive a new trial in the interest of justice. In January 1992, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8065 - 2017-09-19

Sandra L. Pauloski v. Stephen J. Pauloski
support due to his health and the need to locate new employment.[1] In a September 13, 1995 order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5874 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Patricia A. Weed
claims that she is entitled to a new trial because she did not testify at trial and she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4032 - 2017-09-20