Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18351 - 18360 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18351 - 18360 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 49
is misdirected, and thus insufficient, is a question of law inviting our de novo review. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35568 - 2014-09-15
is misdirected, and thus insufficient, is a question of law inviting our de novo review. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35568 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶8 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. DOR v. River City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550082 - 2022-08-02
¶8 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. DOR v. River City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550082 - 2022-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91216 - 2013-01-02
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91216 - 2013-01-02
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Coopman v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30897 - 2007-11-20
a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Coopman v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30897 - 2007-11-20
Ann Lee Bogan v. Price County
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lamardus D. Ford
it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11512 - 2017-09-19
it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11512 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
concluded that the absence of a cover page on Wartman’s proposal was de minimus and remediable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32921 - 2014-09-15
concluded that the absence of a cover page on Wartman’s proposal was de minimus and remediable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32921 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Novell v. Migliaccio, 2008 WI 44
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33689 - 2014-09-15
court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Novell v. Migliaccio, 2008 WI 44
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33689 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo the ultimate question whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863769 - 2024-10-23
, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo the ultimate question whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863769 - 2024-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30554 - 2007-10-09
the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30554 - 2007-10-09