Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18361 - 18370 of 30154 for de.
Search results 18361 - 18370 of 30154 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Melton appealed that decision to the circuit court and received a record review (rather than a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752898 - 2024-01-24
. Melton appealed that decision to the circuit court and received a record review (rather than a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752898 - 2024-01-24
Ann Lee Bogan v. Price County
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rex E. Wollenberg
interpretations. ¶17 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. J.L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6623 - 2005-03-31
interpretations. ¶17 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. J.L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6623 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35908 - 2009-03-17
will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35908 - 2009-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 15, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
prejudiced the defendant are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82390 - 2012-05-14
prejudiced the defendant are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82390 - 2012-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
” and therefore is de novo. ¶5 Maringer is mistaken regarding our standard of review. Although the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127980 - 2014-11-18
” and therefore is de novo. ¶5 Maringer is mistaken regarding our standard of review. Although the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127980 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
posture. We review a circuit court’s dismissal of an action de novo. See Paskiet v. Quality State Oil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211407 - 2018-04-25
posture. We review a circuit court’s dismissal of an action de novo. See Paskiet v. Quality State Oil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211407 - 2018-04-25
[PDF]
James E. Turner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
conclusions of law and statutory interpretation: great weight, due weight and de novo. Great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6564 - 2017-09-19
conclusions of law and statutory interpretation: great weight, due weight and de novo. Great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6564 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5896 - 2017-09-19
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5896 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Post v. Schwall, 157 Wis. 2d 652, 656, 460 N.W.2d 794 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158194 - 2017-09-21
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Post v. Schwall, 157 Wis. 2d 652, 656, 460 N.W.2d 794 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158194 - 2017-09-21