Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18361 - 18370 of 29942 for des.
Search results 18361 - 18370 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Mitchel L. Schanke
), our review is de novo. No. 98-0746-CR 6 The thrust of Schanke’s argument is that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13749 - 2014-09-15
), our review is de novo. No. 98-0746-CR 6 The thrust of Schanke’s argument is that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13749 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134783 - 2015-02-10
to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134783 - 2015-02-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
are multiplicitous is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 401, 576 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31303 - 2014-09-15
are multiplicitous is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 401, 576 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31303 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Windell Carradine
). While we review issues of constitutional law de novo, see State v. Lee, 175 Wis.2d 348, 354, 499 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11440 - 2017-09-19
). While we review issues of constitutional law de novo, see State v. Lee, 175 Wis.2d 348, 354, 499 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11440 - 2017-09-19
Jane Barry v. Maple Bluff Country Club, Inc.
of a statute to undisputed facts, which we decide de novo. Id. at 233, 568 N.W.2d at 34. Statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2558 - 2005-03-31
of a statute to undisputed facts, which we decide de novo. Id. at 233, 568 N.W.2d at 34. Statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2558 - 2005-03-31
Sauk County v. Aaron J. J.
action to restrict a person’s liberty is a question of constitutional law which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7140 - 2005-03-31
action to restrict a person’s liberty is a question of constitutional law which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7140 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a settlement agreement is binding and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139585 - 2015-04-13
a settlement agreement is binding and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139585 - 2015-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law which we review de novo. Furmanski v. Furmanski, 196 Wis. 2d 210, 214, 538 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36786 - 2009-06-16
presents a question of law which we review de novo. Furmanski v. Furmanski, 196 Wis. 2d 210, 214, 538 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36786 - 2009-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2021-22).5 “We review de novo [a] grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758905 - 2024-02-06
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2021-22).5 “We review de novo [a] grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758905 - 2024-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
facts constitute reasonable suspicion such that the stop was constitutional is a question we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
facts constitute reasonable suspicion such that the stop was constitutional is a question we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16