Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18371 - 18380 of 84312 for case number.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
excludes from its numbered pages the statement of the case and statement of the facts, contrary to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184843 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael Solomon v. Gary R. McCaughtry
the committee acted properly in resentencing Solomon after his case was remanded to the committee. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12940 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the case the way he saw it, and the court should have balanced the sentencing factors differently and more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78867 - 2012-03-06

State v. Jeremy J. Mayotte
to the exclusionary rule applies to this case. By the Court.—Judgment and order reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20905 - 2006-01-09

CA Blank Order
dismissed and read-in a number of additional charges. Harrison provided the court with a signed plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146199 - 2015-08-10

Baron L. Walker, Sr. v. Daniel Bertrand
evidence to support his adjudication of guilt for disobeying orders. We therefore remand the case to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13550 - 2010-06-01

Elizabeth A. Connor v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
at Heckel’s. It discredited a third witness for exaggerating the number of times she heard comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2548 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was discretionary. See Osterhues, 282 Wis. 2d 228, ¶39. In the present case, the Board properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68270 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
these findings, the circuit court did not cite to the statutory subsections by number and letter. However
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395760 - 2021-07-22

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Francia M. Evers
2003 WI 92 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 02-2147-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16660 - 2017-09-21