Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18381 - 18390 of 98468 for court records search online.
Search results 18381 - 18390 of 98468 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
for the strike.” The trial court disagreed when it ruled that “[t]he absence of a record in this case precludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49274 - 2010-04-26
for the strike.” The trial court disagreed when it ruled that “[t]he absence of a record in this case precludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49274 - 2010-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
an abuse of discretion if the record shows that the circuit court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116168 - 2014-07-07
an abuse of discretion if the record shows that the circuit court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116168 - 2014-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
the insufficient in-court proceedings. Thus, the record, as is, does not establish Holan’s repeater status. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30
the insufficient in-court proceedings. Thus, the record, as is, does not establish Holan’s repeater status. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 24, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61618 - 2011-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 24, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61618 - 2011-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
for Legal Action and its clients. Thus, the record supports the trial court’s inference that Legal Action’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29388 - 2007-06-18
for Legal Action and its clients. Thus, the record supports the trial court’s inference that Legal Action’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29388 - 2007-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. We have reviewed the record and must disagree. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29679 - 2007-07-17
. We have reviewed the record and must disagree. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29679 - 2007-07-17
COURT OF APPEALS
moved to correct the record, claiming errors in the transcript. Following a hearing, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82293 - 2012-05-09
moved to correct the record, claiming errors in the transcript. Following a hearing, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82293 - 2012-05-09
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the recently accepted case 2010AP425
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85898 - 2014-09-15
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85898 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the record does not support that decision, and the court failed to allocate marital debt. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29235 - 2007-05-30
the record does not support that decision, and the court failed to allocate marital debt. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29235 - 2007-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
goes on to argue that the trial court’s suggestion that there is other evidence in the record from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31860 - 2008-02-19
goes on to argue that the trial court’s suggestion that there is other evidence in the record from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31860 - 2008-02-19