Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18381 - 18390 of 30165 for de.
Search results 18381 - 18390 of 30165 for de.
State v. Lisa K. Kraus
). However, whether those facts establish probable cause to arrest is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15478 - 2005-03-31
). However, whether those facts establish probable cause to arrest is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s decision to deny a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870564 - 2024-11-05
the circuit court’s decision to deny a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870564 - 2024-11-05
State v. Tommy Smith, Jr.
of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5651 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5651 - 2005-03-31
Patricia Lemke-Wojnicki v. Paul & Cindy Kolodziaj
. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5201 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5201 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael J. Lindholm
de novo. See State v. Fry, 129 Wis. 2d 301, 305, 385 N.W.2d 196, 199 (Ct. App. 1985). Sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15938 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Fry, 129 Wis. 2d 301, 305, 385 N.W.2d 196, 199 (Ct. App. 1985). Sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15938 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.)). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Bell, 380 Wis. 2d 616, ¶8. We conclude that the introduction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771390 - 2024-03-05
.)). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Bell, 380 Wis. 2d 616, ¶8. We conclude that the introduction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771390 - 2024-03-05
Wm. R. Hubbell Steel Corporation v. Wisconsin Power and Light Company
, 528 N.W.2d 413, 414 (1995). Our review is de novo. Nagel Hart, Inc. v. United Pac. Ins. Co., 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7981 - 2005-03-31
, 528 N.W.2d 413, 414 (1995). Our review is de novo. Nagel Hart, Inc. v. United Pac. Ins. Co., 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7981 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
determinations. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45107 - 2009-12-29
determinations. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45107 - 2009-12-29
[PDF]
Susan H. Ripple v. R.F. Technologies, Inc.
and the circuit court granted the motion. ¶6 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4419 - 2017-09-19
and the circuit court granted the motion. ¶6 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4419 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123107 - 2014-10-07
of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123107 - 2014-10-07