Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Fischer, 2010 WI 6, ¶15, 322 Wis. 2d 265, 778 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95705 - 2014-09-15
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Fischer, 2010 WI 6, ¶15, 322 Wis. 2d 265, 778 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95705 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Claus Bruestle
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7455 - 2017-09-20
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7455 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d 190, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119266 - 2014-08-12
of law we review de novo. K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d 190, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119266 - 2014-08-12
State v. Keith M. Carey
of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6586 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6586 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
for our de novo review. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27153 - 2006-11-15
for our de novo review. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27153 - 2006-11-15
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Fowler
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2950 - 2017-09-19
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2950 - 2017-09-19
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13175 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13175 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence.” Id. “Whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32179 - 2008-03-24
sentence.” Id. “Whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32179 - 2008-03-24
State v. David M. Mosel
a question of law, which we review de novo, State v. Johnson, 177 Wis.2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d 876, 879 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10848 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, which we review de novo, State v. Johnson, 177 Wis.2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d 876, 879 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10848 - 2005-03-31
State v. Aaron Evans
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Schmaling, 198 Wis. 2d 756, 760, 543 N.W.2d 555 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15946 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Schmaling, 198 Wis. 2d 756, 760, 543 N.W.2d 555 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15946 - 2005-03-31