Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 29823 for des.
Ryan J. Enea v. James G. Linn, M.D.
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4495 - 2005-03-31
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4495 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Nos. 2013AP2430-CR 2013AP2431-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133770 - 2017-09-21
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Nos. 2013AP2430-CR 2013AP2431-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133770 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W.2d at 437. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95802 - 2014-09-15
, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W.2d at 437. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95802 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Philip J. Foster
the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14978 - 2017-09-21
the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Norman O. Brown v. Stephen Puckett
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14555 - 2017-09-21
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14555 - 2017-09-21
Robert Potratz v. Stokely Usa, Inc.
court and decide de novo whether summary judgment is appropriate. Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9282 - 2005-03-31
court and decide de novo whether summary judgment is appropriate. Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9282 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but “we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but “we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
Sauk County v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14852 - 2005-03-31
We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14852 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an “end-around” the statutory time period to appeal and de facto extend that time period by several months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141811 - 2015-05-19
an “end-around” the statutory time period to appeal and de facto extend that time period by several months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141811 - 2015-05-19