Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 29827 for des.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 70
review de novo. See Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liab. Ins. Plan, 2001 WI 41, ¶8, 242 Wis. 2d 491
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62662 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liab. Ins. Plan, 2001 WI 41, ¶8, 242 Wis. 2d 491
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62662 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant’s successive appeal is procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85767 - 2014-09-15
a defendant’s successive appeal is procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85767 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gerold A. Haut
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id. If a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7449 - 2017-09-20
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id. If a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7449 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Courtyard Condominium Association, Inc. v. Barbara Draper
two or more statutes also presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2771 - 2017-09-19
two or more statutes also presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2771 - 2017-09-19
State v. Albert L. Black
review de novo. State v. Tremaine Y., 2005 WI App 56, ¶9, 279 Wis. 2d 448, 694 N.W.2d 462. When we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26169 - 2006-08-09
review de novo. State v. Tremaine Y., 2005 WI App 56, ¶9, 279 Wis. 2d 448, 694 N.W.2d 462. When we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26169 - 2006-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
those facts satisfy constitutional standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29452 - 2007-06-20
those facts satisfy constitutional standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29452 - 2007-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
immunity statute applies to bar Mason’s claim is a question of law we review de novo. Kosky v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34055 - 2008-09-15
immunity statute applies to bar Mason’s claim is a question of law we review de novo. Kosky v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34055 - 2008-09-15
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16969 - 2005-03-31
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16969 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
. Stat. § (Rule) 809.13. We review a question of rule interpretation de novo. City of West Allis v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17484 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § (Rule) 809.13. We review a question of rule interpretation de novo. City of West Allis v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17484 - 2005-03-31
Jane Barry v. Maple Bluff Country Club, Inc.
of a statute to undisputed facts, which we decide de novo. Id. at 233, 568 N.W.2d at 34. Statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2558 - 2005-03-31
of a statute to undisputed facts, which we decide de novo. Id. at 233, 568 N.W.2d at 34. Statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2558 - 2005-03-31