Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 29713 for des.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 29713 for des.
State v. Ronald G. Fedler
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4448 - 2005-03-31
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4448 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123107 - 2014-10-07
of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123107 - 2014-10-07
City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
. Stat. § (Rule) 809.13. We review a question of rule interpretation de novo. City of West Allis v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17484 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § (Rule) 809.13. We review a question of rule interpretation de novo. City of West Allis v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17484 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
apply the same methodology as the circuit court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33689 - 2008-08-12
apply the same methodology as the circuit court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33689 - 2008-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We uphold a circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, but decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997158 - 2025-08-20
. We uphold a circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, but decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997158 - 2025-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
determinations. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45107 - 2009-12-29
determinations. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45107 - 2009-12-29
[PDF]
Mehran Heydarpour v. Stone Dimensions, Inc.
to address the attorney’s fee issue de novo. ¶20 The circuit court did not decide whether interest could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26176 - 2017-09-21
to address the attorney’s fee issue de novo. ¶20 The circuit court did not decide whether interest could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26176 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 90
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38150 - 2014-09-15
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38150 - 2014-09-15
State v. Todd Fugate
that we review de novo. Id. at 128. Lastly, we need not address both Strickland prongs if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5965 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Id. at 128. Lastly, we need not address both Strickland prongs if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5965 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Cir. 2002). No. 2008AP2906-FT 5 question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36350 - 2014-09-15
Cir. 2002). No. 2008AP2906-FT 5 question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36350 - 2014-09-15