Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 50122 for our.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 50122 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and by failing to award her $800. Based upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the appellate record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252659 - 2020-01-22
and by failing to award her $800. Based upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the appellate record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252659 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186507 - 2017-09-21
merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186507 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
court’s sentencing discretion. Our standard of review for criminal sentencing appeals is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27113 - 2014-09-15
court’s sentencing discretion. Our standard of review for criminal sentencing appeals is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27113 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174937 - 2017-09-21
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174937 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723133 - 2023-10-31
also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723133 - 2023-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not proceed further with our analysis. See id., ¶38. For the sake of completeness, however, we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
not proceed further with our analysis. See id., ¶38. For the sake of completeness, however, we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
State v. Stacy L. Blunt
of the record that [Blunt] knew of his right.” Id. Although our review of the record indicates that Blunt made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11680 - 2005-03-31
of the record that [Blunt] knew of his right.” Id. Although our review of the record indicates that Blunt made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11680 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97088 - 2014-09-15
court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97088 - 2014-09-15
State v. Beverly G.
not optimal in any direction but we need to do our best to ensure the child’s safety and well being and do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17898 - 2005-05-02
not optimal in any direction but we need to do our best to ensure the child’s safety and well being and do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17898 - 2005-05-02
Maurice D. Williams v. The Pub, Inc.
B. Tanner Co. v. Sparta-Tomah Broad. Co., 716 F.2d 1155, 1159 (7th Cir. 1983). In our analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10681 - 2005-03-31
B. Tanner Co. v. Sparta-Tomah Broad. Co., 716 F.2d 1155, 1159 (7th Cir. 1983). In our analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10681 - 2005-03-31