Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18391 - 18400 of 58506 for speedy trial.

Allan J. Payleitner v. Timothy I. Mac Gillis
. Payleitner and Mary Ann Wick, as trustees of the Payleitner Family Trust, appeal from the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16132 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
right of confrontation by limiting his cross-examination of the victim at trial; (3) the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189003 - 2017-09-21

Diane M. Wettstaedt v. Gary E. Wettstaedt
at the time of the divorce. She claims the trial court erred in reducing the amount of Gary Wettstaedt’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3250 - 2005-03-31

City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, first offense. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5354 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Randy J. Ravenscroft v. Diane M. Ravenscroft
. Randy Ravenscroft appeals trial court orders determining his child support arrearage for the years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13398 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
concludes that trial counsel was not ineffective because the specific motion to strike that O’Boyle claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107713 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
in which the trial court determined that: Stamps trespassed on Stanford’s property by parking his work van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117587 - 2014-07-21

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Frank M. Kett
the Wisconsin Consumer Act (WCA). The customers claim: (1) that they prevailed at the trial court level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12138 - 2005-03-31

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Frank M. Kett
the Wisconsin Consumer Act (WCA). The customers claim: (1) that they prevailed at the trial court level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12139 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Human Services Department v. Elizabeth A.J.
., their minor daughter. They argue that: (1) the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a videotape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12591 - 2005-03-31