Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1841 - 1850 of 6749 for mix.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and postconviction proceedings. But ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of fact and law, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087493 - 2026-03-11

[PDF] State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process. Id. at 516. Whether the PSI writer was biased is a mixed question of law and fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4661 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
a mixed question of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698 (1984). We will not set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46617 - 2010-02-09

State v. Jason S. Petri
Whether counsel's actions were deficient or prejudicial is a mixed question of law and fact. See Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14748 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jaamal D. Bell
of counsel presents a mixed question of law and fact. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20010 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John Riegleman v. State of Wisconsin Chiropractic Examining Board
be presented in the circuit court. WIS. STAT. § 227.57(1). We apply a mixed standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4359 - 2017-09-19

County of Rock v. James M. Goldhagen
the legal limits for intoxication. Finally, Goldhagen’s trial testimony was that he had consumed five mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2485 - 2005-03-31

County of Rock v. James M. Goldhagen
the legal limits for intoxication. Finally, Goldhagen’s trial testimony was that he had consumed five mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2486 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
counsel was ineffective is a mixed question of fact and law.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶19. Here, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144245 - 2015-07-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel presents a mixed question of law and fact. State v. Gutierrez, 2020 WI 52, ¶19, 391 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098837 - 2026-03-31