Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1841 - 1850 of 6659 for mix.
Search results 1841 - 1850 of 6659 for mix.
COURT OF APPEALS
facts to entitle the defendant to a hearing for the relief requested is a mixed standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35711 - 2009-03-02
facts to entitle the defendant to a hearing for the relief requested is a mixed standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35711 - 2009-03-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
]hether a defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
]hether a defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
[PDF]
State v. James E. Beasley
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present mixed questions of law and fact. See State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2242 - 2017-09-19
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present mixed questions of law and fact. See State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2242 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress a confession under a mixed standard of review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233130 - 2019-01-23
a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress a confession under a mixed standard of review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233130 - 2019-01-23
[PDF]
State v. Darnell C. Stevens
. at 697. ¶13 Whether counsel’s actions constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24740 - 2017-09-21
. at 697. ¶13 Whether counsel’s actions constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24740 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
placement order, which we consider under a mixed standard of review. We uphold the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069548 - 2026-01-28
placement order, which we consider under a mixed standard of review. We uphold the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069548 - 2026-01-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶43 (citation omitted). “Reasonable cause is a mixed question of fact and law.” Id., ¶29. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221950 - 2018-10-17
., ¶43 (citation omitted). “Reasonable cause is a mixed question of fact and law.” Id., ¶29. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221950 - 2018-10-17
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
of performance and prejudice is a mixed question of law and fact. Id. at 698. Thus, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12447 - 2017-09-21
of performance and prejudice is a mixed question of law and fact. Id. at 698. Thus, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
of performance and prejudice is a mixed question of law and fact. Id. at 698. Thus, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12448 - 2017-09-21
of performance and prejudice is a mixed question of law and fact. Id. at 698. Thus, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Keeler
violates a defendant’s protected interests under the double jeopardy clause presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15118 - 2017-09-21
violates a defendant’s protected interests under the double jeopardy clause presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15118 - 2017-09-21