Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1841 - 1850 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 1841 - 1850 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South Milwaukee
Bluff claims the trial court erred when it found that there were no compelling equitable reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2831 - 2005-03-31
Bluff claims the trial court erred when it found that there were no compelling equitable reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2831 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33862 - 2008-09-02
that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33862 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
for postconviction relief. Wilber argues that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33862 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. Wilber argues that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33862 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial court’s objective bias denied him of his constitutional right to a fair trial and that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762884 - 2024-02-13
trial court’s objective bias denied him of his constitutional right to a fair trial and that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762884 - 2024-02-13
State v. David E. Rusch
for a new trial. He contends on appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11527 - 2005-03-31
for a new trial. He contends on appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11527 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it purportedly failed to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28072 - 2007-02-12
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it purportedly failed to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28072 - 2007-02-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentencing relief. The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28072 - 2014-09-15
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentencing relief. The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28072 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Chavis J. Sheriff v. Edwardo G. Arellano, M.D.
a judgment dismissing their medical malpractice claims. On appeal, they challenge the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7869 - 2017-09-19
a judgment dismissing their medical malpractice claims. On appeal, they challenge the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7869 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Pratt argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the misjoinder or move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134783 - 2017-09-21
Pratt argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the misjoinder or move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134783 - 2017-09-21
Chavis J. Sheriff v. Edwardo G. Arellano, M.D.
, they challenge the trial court's evidentiary and discovery rulings and contend that the trial judge failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7869 - 2005-03-31
, they challenge the trial court's evidentiary and discovery rulings and contend that the trial judge failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7869 - 2005-03-31