Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18401 - 18410 of 49879 for our.
Search results 18401 - 18410 of 49879 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
stated, “[w]e need finality in our litigation.” Id., ¶27 (quoting Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d at 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85107 - 2012-07-24
stated, “[w]e need finality in our litigation.” Id., ¶27 (quoting Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d at 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85107 - 2012-07-24
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131913 - 2014-12-15
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131913 - 2014-12-15
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
768, 771 (1977) (quoted source omitted). Our review of the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15440 - 2005-03-31
768, 771 (1977) (quoted source omitted). Our review of the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15440 - 2005-03-31
Dante R. Voss v. David H. Schwarz
under electronic monitoring, which was denied. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 Our certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19335 - 2005-08-17
under electronic monitoring, which was denied. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 Our certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19335 - 2005-08-17
CA Blank Order
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109299 - 2014-03-17
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109299 - 2014-03-17
State v. Tdurado Jacques Head
deprived of his statutory right to all available peremptory challenges. It is therefore irrelevant to our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13574 - 2005-03-31
deprived of his statutory right to all available peremptory challenges. It is therefore irrelevant to our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13574 - 2005-03-31
Jessica A. Rusch v. Adam D. Steinke
, 2003, which was not timely appealed.[2] See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.10(4) (limiting our jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21
, 2003, which was not timely appealed.[2] See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.10(4) (limiting our jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 971.08 certain requirements for ensuring that a plea is knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149272 - 2017-09-21
. § 971.08 certain requirements for ensuring that a plea is knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149272 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief. Mitchell argues he is entitled to a new trial on various grounds. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259298 - 2020-05-05
relief. Mitchell argues he is entitled to a new trial on various grounds. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259298 - 2020-05-05
[PDF]
Amir Mahmoud v. Michael Ortiz
asserted that Mahmoud had failed to meet his burden of proof. Had that been the issue on appeal, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6387 - 2017-09-19
asserted that Mahmoud had failed to meet his burden of proof. Had that been the issue on appeal, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6387 - 2017-09-19