Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18411 - 18420 of 74949 for public records.
Search results 18411 - 18420 of 74949 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 Pittsley’s precise words are somewhat difficult to discern in the video recording. 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738081 - 2023-12-13
3 Pittsley’s precise words are somewhat difficult to discern in the video recording. 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738081 - 2023-12-13
[PDF]
(concluding that we may take judicial notice of the entry of records on CCAP). No. 2023AP1402 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838462 - 2024-08-15
(concluding that we may take judicial notice of the entry of records on CCAP). No. 2023AP1402 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838462 - 2024-08-15
[PDF]
State v. George Reed
and facts of record. See State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis.2d No. 97-2830-CR 5 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13073 - 2017-09-21
and facts of record. See State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis.2d No. 97-2830-CR 5 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13073 - 2017-09-21
State v. George Reed
as it has a reasonable basis and is made in accordance with accepted legal standards and facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31
as it has a reasonable basis and is made in accordance with accepted legal standards and facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
record conclusively demonstrates that the movant is not entitled to relief. State v. Balliette, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125451 - 2017-09-21
record conclusively demonstrates that the movant is not entitled to relief. State v. Balliette, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125451 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rolando M. Tong
to Van Horn’s recorded statement, which was incorporated into Powell’s affidavit, when Tong “pulled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12964 - 2005-03-31
to Van Horn’s recorded statement, which was incorporated into Powell’s affidavit, when Tong “pulled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12964 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shomas T. Winston
credit for having a minimal record,” and the trial court “appeared to find fault that [sic] Mr. Winston
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25688 - 2006-06-26
credit for having a minimal record,” and the trial court “appeared to find fault that [sic] Mr. Winston
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25688 - 2006-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The record reflects that on August 30, 2007, the summons and complaint mailed by the clerk’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82286 - 2014-09-15
The record reflects that on August 30, 2007, the summons and complaint mailed by the clerk’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82286 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
reflecting August 13, 2007, as the date of issuance and mailing. ¶5 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82286 - 2012-05-09
reflecting August 13, 2007, as the date of issuance and mailing. ¶5 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82286 - 2012-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645206 - 2023-04-18
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645206 - 2023-04-18