Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18421 - 18430 of 29832 for des.
Search results 18421 - 18430 of 29832 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
Adams filed a timely de novo appeal to the Milwaukee County Circuit Court. The circuit court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106507 - 2014-01-13
Adams filed a timely de novo appeal to the Milwaukee County Circuit Court. The circuit court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106507 - 2014-01-13
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
that appellate courts review de novo. See id. at ¶18. However, the trial court’s finding of fact regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2732 - 2005-03-31
that appellate courts review de novo. See id. at ¶18. However, the trial court’s finding of fact regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2732 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W.2d at 437. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95802 - 2014-09-15
, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W.2d at 437. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95802 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Cynthia S.
the historical facts meet the constitutional test is a question of law,” which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5881 - 2017-09-19
the historical facts meet the constitutional test is a question of law,” which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5881 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5896 - 2017-09-19
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5896 - 2017-09-19
2010 WI APP 67
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings on summary judgment, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49357 - 2011-08-21
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings on summary judgment, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49357 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
WI App 18
) presents a question of law. Ordinarily, questions of law are reviewed de novo. See id., ¶31. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183375 - 2017-09-21
) presents a question of law. Ordinarily, questions of law are reviewed de novo. See id., ¶31. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Beverly Halverson v. PDQ Food Stores, Inc.
record, to which PDQ did not object, and we must conduct our de novo review based on the materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14531 - 2017-09-21
record, to which PDQ did not object, and we must conduct our de novo review based on the materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14531 - 2017-09-21
State v. Norman R.
such grounds, see Wis. Stat. § 48.424, was held as a bench trial. Although we review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5322 - 2005-03-31
such grounds, see Wis. Stat. § 48.424, was held as a bench trial. Although we review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5322 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Randall
of “constitutional fact,” such as the ultimate issue in this case, de novo. See Evans, 187 Wis.2d at 86, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7846 - 2017-09-19
of “constitutional fact,” such as the ultimate issue in this case, de novo. See Evans, 187 Wis.2d at 86, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7846 - 2017-09-19