Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18421 - 18430 of 20952 for word.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of government and the official acts of those officers and employees who represent them.” In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881634 - 2024-11-27

State v. Michael F. Howard
degree, on the concurrent promise. Without this proof, we cannot say, in the words of Santobello
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2852 - 2005-03-31

U.S. Oil Inc. v. City of Fond Du Lac
., the word “or,” when it originally laid out the factors, see Anchor Sav., 120 Wis.2d at 397, 355 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8546 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction proceedings that Knight stated he did not need to see the videotape. In the circuit court’s words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73905 - 2011-11-14

[PDF] Time Warner, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
in Article V.D.2. containing the “sole negligence” exclusion is preceded by the introductory words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2883 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
explained in denying Boose’s juror bias claim, “neither her words nor her demeanor demonstrated bias of any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88167 - 2012-10-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. In other words, the parties’ conduct here does not demonstrate mutual consent to the sale or lease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768307 - 2024-02-27

Terrence A. Borneman v. Corwyn Transport, Ltd.
). The employee's consent can be inferred from his words and acts bearing on his intent. In the case at bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11357 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wayne A. Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co., Inc.
by wording the contract to tie the amount of the commission to the personal property and leaving every
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9116 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
… is to deter future Fourth Amendment violations.” Id. at 236-37. In other words, the “exclusionary rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247234 - 2019-09-24