Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18441 - 18450 of 34724 for in n.

COURT OF APPEALS
generally look for reasons to sustain its discretionary decision, Loomans v. Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co., 38 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135536 - 2015-02-24

[PDF] Eagle Property Management v. Gloria Small
and plain meaning. Bindrim v. B. & J. Ins. Agency, 190 Wis.2d 525, 534, 527 N.W.2d 320, 323 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8143 - 2017-09-19

State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
.” [Darnell, 716 F.2d] at 481 n.5. (Record reference omitted.) ¶11 We agree. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-03-31

State v. George F. Appleyard
of intoxicants to warrant an arrest. Id. at 453-54 n.6. Appleyard contends that there is even less evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2756 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Such a motion is governed by WIS. STAT. § 805.14, which provides that “[n]o [such] No. 2021AP1954 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690774 - 2023-08-15

COURT OF APPEALS
with each other.” The court also explained its public policy reasoning: [O]n balance we want the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75108 - 2005-03-31

City of Mequon v. Michael Sterr
v. Reliance Ins. Co., 152 Wis.2d 234, 240, 448 N.W.2d 256, 259 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9509 - 2005-03-31

State v. Steven A. Hipwood
enforcement officers and citizens constitutes a Fourth Amendment violation. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 19 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10297 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, ¶1 n.2, 338 Wis. 2d 565, 808 N.W.2d 691. There was no comparable statute to WIS. STAT. § 973.09(3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208168 - 2018-02-14

_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Robert N. Martinez 03-03-2009
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36493 - 2009-05-11