Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18451 - 18460 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18451 - 18460 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260762 - 2020-05-19
findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260762 - 2020-05-19
Ameritech Advanced Data Services of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
presents a question of law, which generally we review de novo. American Family, 214 Wis.2d at 580, 571 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12527 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law, which generally we review de novo. American Family, 214 Wis.2d at 580, 571 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12527 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason J.C.
of a court’s inherent power is a question of law which we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12425 - 2005-03-31
of a court’s inherent power is a question of law which we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12425 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). No. 2024AP306 6 that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032489 - 2025-11-04
, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). No. 2024AP306 6 that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032489 - 2025-11-04
State v. Philip J. Foster
materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31
materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether two charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410383 - 2021-08-17
. Whether two charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410383 - 2021-08-17
[PDF]
State v. Travis Allen
. In Wisconsin, however, we review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
. In Wisconsin, however, we review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Associates Financial Services Company of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Ora Jean Brown
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4716 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4716 - 2017-09-19
State v. Clinton L. Duhm
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6098 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6098 - 2005-03-31