Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18451 - 18460 of 68502 for did.
Search results 18451 - 18460 of 68502 for did.
State v. Cleveland R. Barnes
court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Barnes pled no contest to delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2005-03-31
court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Barnes pled no contest to delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
have independently reviewed the record. Our independent review of the record did not disclose any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116388 - 2014-07-08
have independently reviewed the record. Our independent review of the record did not disclose any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116388 - 2014-07-08
CA Blank Order
indicated on the applications that she did not own any vehicles; and (4) she was aware
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123026 - 2014-10-07
indicated on the applications that she did not own any vehicles; and (4) she was aware
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123026 - 2014-10-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest plea to kidnapping. Stevenson did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36403 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest plea to kidnapping. Stevenson did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36403 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
summarily affirm the order. It is undisputed that McAdory did not verify his petition by having
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158872 - 2017-09-21
summarily affirm the order. It is undisputed that McAdory did not verify his petition by having
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158872 - 2017-09-21
State v. William F.S.
objection or claim of prejudice, the trial court properly allowed the motion. While the motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14548 - 2005-03-31
objection or claim of prejudice, the trial court properly allowed the motion. While the motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14548 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William M. Jones
. For some reason not revealed in the record, this sentence was stayed until August 20, 1994. Jones did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8621 - 2017-09-19
. For some reason not revealed in the record, this sentence was stayed until August 20, 1994. Jones did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8621 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tony L Sutton
the intervention of another person; and (3) the trial court did not inform him of the elements of the inchoate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11678 - 2005-03-31
the intervention of another person; and (3) the trial court did not inform him of the elements of the inchoate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11678 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Miller
conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it refused to give a self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12374 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it refused to give a self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12374 - 2005-03-31
Jerry Person v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Furthermore, Person’s expert witness, Jack Casper, did not contradict Herro’s conclusion. Casper gave five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7213 - 2005-03-31
. Furthermore, Person’s expert witness, Jack Casper, did not contradict Herro’s conclusion. Casper gave five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7213 - 2005-03-31