Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18461 - 18470 of 59310 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 18461 - 18470 of 59310 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Sunnyside Feed Company, Inc. v. City of Portage
Company’s (Sunnyside) nuisance claim. The City and Employers Insurance contend that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13733 - 2014-09-15
Company’s (Sunnyside) nuisance claim. The City and Employers Insurance contend that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13733 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert G. Harkey
claims and affirm the judgment and the order. NOS. 96-1950-CR 96-2614-CR 2 Harkey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11408 - 2017-09-19
claims and affirm the judgment and the order. NOS. 96-1950-CR 96-2614-CR 2 Harkey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11408 - 2017-09-19
Sunnyside Feed Company, Inc. v. City of Portage
-verdict motion to dismiss Sunnyside Feed Company’s (Sunnyside) nuisance claim. The City and Employers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13733 - 2005-03-31
-verdict motion to dismiss Sunnyside Feed Company’s (Sunnyside) nuisance claim. The City and Employers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13733 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerjuan Spiller
), all as party to a crime. Spiller claims that: (1) the trial court erred when it summarily denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3188 - 2005-03-31
), all as party to a crime. Spiller claims that: (1) the trial court erred when it summarily denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3188 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert G. Harkey
was improperly admitted. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and the order. Harkey’s first claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11408 - 2005-03-31
was improperly admitted. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and the order. Harkey’s first claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11408 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06)[1] motion. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31794 - 2008-02-19
his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06)[1] motion. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31794 - 2008-02-19
State v. Sherman B. Rones
his postconviction motions. He claims that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2988 - 2009-03-17
his postconviction motions. He claims that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2988 - 2009-03-17
State v. Michael Evans
claimed that his trial counsel had been ineffective for failing “to properly investigate, to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2677 - 2006-02-15
claimed that his trial counsel had been ineffective for failing “to properly investigate, to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2677 - 2006-02-15
Louis Zink, Jr. v. Akhatar Khwaja
a judgment dismissing his nuisance claim against Akhtar Khwaja and Berlin Cranberry Ltd.[1] Zink contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
a judgment dismissing his nuisance claim against Akhtar Khwaja and Berlin Cranberry Ltd.[1] Zink contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
2011 WI APP 10
to state a claim for which relief could be granted. In particular, the City argued that Acevedo’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57948 - 2012-01-22
to state a claim for which relief could be granted. In particular, the City argued that Acevedo’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57948 - 2012-01-22