Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18461 - 18470 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18461 - 18470 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W.2d at 437. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95802 - 2014-09-15
, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W.2d at 437. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95802 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Philip J. Foster
the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14978 - 2017-09-21
the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Norman O. Brown v. Stephen Puckett
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14555 - 2017-09-21
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14555 - 2017-09-21
Robert Potratz v. Stokely Usa, Inc.
court and decide de novo whether summary judgment is appropriate. Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9282 - 2005-03-31
court and decide de novo whether summary judgment is appropriate. Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9282 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but “we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but “we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
Sauk County v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14852 - 2005-03-31
We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14852 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment de novo, applying the same method as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28587 - 2007-03-28
summary judgment de novo, applying the same method as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28587 - 2007-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS
an “end-around” the statutory time period to appeal and de facto extend that time period by several months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141811 - 2015-05-19
an “end-around” the statutory time period to appeal and de facto extend that time period by several months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141811 - 2015-05-19
Clark Wolff v. Grant County Board of Adjustment
which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 217 Wis.2d 640, 644, 579 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14581 - 2005-03-31
which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 217 Wis.2d 640, 644, 579 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14581 - 2005-03-31