Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18461 - 18470 of 40248 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
“may admit into evidence the audiovisual recording of an oral statement of a child who is available
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035873 - 2025-11-11

COURT OF APPEALS
offender or pedophile. However, given Michael’s statements that certain Bible passages entitled him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28767 - 2007-04-23

COURT OF APPEALS
counsel should have objected when the prosecutor asked Homman to read into the record a written statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79080 - 2012-03-05

State v. Darnell Jackson
failing was having the defendant refute statements in the presentence report, rather than doing so himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7756 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Devontes D. Harris
by the prosecution during jury selection, the defense in its opening statement and closing argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18848 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ryan D.D.
a placement at Lincoln Hills, the court made the following statements: I don’t want to send you to Lincoln
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12833 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ashland County Child Support Agency v. Gary R. Sarver
state, “I can find that there is not enough income right now, at least on paper ….” This statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20961 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Christopher J. Klingeisen
on inaccurate information and violated his due process rights; and (3) the prosecutor made false statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4906 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the objection on the grounds that the statement would have been reasonably understood by jurors as a “moral
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163034 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
] court’s findings regarding the factual circumstances surrounding the statement.” State v. Jerrell C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28704 - 2007-04-16