Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18461 - 18470 of 65143 for or b.
Search results 18461 - 18470 of 65143 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
by parole by the department [of corrections].” Wis. Stat. § 973.013(1)(b). Release on parole is governed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60994 - 2011-03-14
by parole by the department [of corrections].” Wis. Stat. § 973.013(1)(b). Release on parole is governed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60994 - 2011-03-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the person was in custody when he or she committed the crime. See § 946.43(2m)(b). At Rodgers’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
the person was in custody when he or she committed the crime. See § 946.43(2m)(b). At Rodgers’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
State v. Priest Johnson
Johnson’s motions. B. Access to Transcripts and Public Records ¶10 Wisconsin Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24596 - 2006-03-27
Johnson’s motions. B. Access to Transcripts and Public Records ¶10 Wisconsin Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24596 - 2006-03-27
[PDF]
State v. Paul A. Gocker
. § 906.11(1)(b). By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7397 - 2017-09-20
. § 906.11(1)(b). By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7397 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
James R. Schilling v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
, converting the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment. See WIS. STAT. § 802.06(2)(b) (2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6856 - 2017-09-20
, converting the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment. See WIS. STAT. § 802.06(2)(b) (2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6856 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
with other traffic or to comply with traffic regulations. Subsecs. 346.50(1)(a) and (b). ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29301 - 2014-09-15
with other traffic or to comply with traffic regulations. Subsecs. 346.50(1)(a) and (b). ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29301 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The State urged denial of the motions, in pertinent part because “[b]ased on the information available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183044 - 2017-09-21
. The State urged denial of the motions, in pertinent part because “[b]ased on the information available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183044 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nick Allen
that the erroneously admitted statements caused prejudice. Accordingly, we reject his claim. B. Section 752.35, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10693 - 2005-03-31
that the erroneously admitted statements caused prejudice. Accordingly, we reject his claim. B. Section 752.35, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10693 - 2005-03-31
Vern Cramer v. Marinette County
OF APPEALS DISTRICT III Vern Cramer, d/b/a Cramer Excavating and Hauling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5268 - 2005-03-31
OF APPEALS DISTRICT III Vern Cramer, d/b/a Cramer Excavating and Hauling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5268 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert A. Lohmeier
(3), 346.17(3) and 946.49(1)(b) (1997-98).[1] Lohmeier’s probation included a number of conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2166 - 2005-03-31
(3), 346.17(3) and 946.49(1)(b) (1997-98).[1] Lohmeier’s probation included a number of conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2166 - 2005-03-31