Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18471 - 18480 of 29823 for des.

State v. Kovac Kidd
that we review de novo. State v. Ballos, 230 Wis. 2d 495, 500, 602 N.W.2d 117 (Ct. App. 1999); State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7044 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
” and therefore is de novo. ¶5 Maringer is mistaken regarding our standard of review. Although the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127980 - 2014-11-18

08AP2906 City of Mequon v. Gleen H. Sievers.doc
a question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo review.” State v. Sisk, 2001 WI App 182, ¶7, 247 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36350 - 2009-05-05

COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether a motion is sufficient is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108337 - 2014-02-24

[PDF] State v. Donald Mentzel
a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774, 776
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12661 - 2017-09-21

Seidel Tanning Corporation v. City of Milwaukee
have been instructed on res ipsa loquitur is a question of law that we review de novo. See Lecander v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
corrections officers on the job and, thus, the correct standard of review is de novo. LIRC argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698360 - 2023-09-06

[PDF] Glinder Drake v. Marcia E. Huber
judgment. See RULE 802.06(2)(b), STATS. Our review of a trial court’s denial of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11569 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
LIRC’s legal conclusions de novo; however, we defer to LIRC’s findings of fact “if they are supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537060 - 2022-07-07

[PDF] State v. Rex B. Roberts
passes constitutional muster is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Richardson, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8149 - 2017-09-19