Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18471 - 18480 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 18471 - 18480 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Arpke
. Arpke failed several field sobriety tests and was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3625 - 2017-09-19
. Arpke failed several field sobriety tests and was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3625 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lee A. Gates
to establish probable cause. See id. Probable cause is a commonsense test based on what a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15436 - 2005-03-31
to establish probable cause. See id. Probable cause is a commonsense test based on what a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15436 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael J. Arpke
of intoxicants. Arpke failed several field sobriety tests and was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3625 - 2005-03-31
of intoxicants. Arpke failed several field sobriety tests and was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factor test because the sentencing court and the parties overlooked Miller’s statutory Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86137 - 2014-09-15
factor test because the sentencing court and the parties overlooked Miller’s statutory Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86137 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we affirm. ¶2 The parties agree that the operative test is set forth in State v. Perry, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265330 - 2020-07-28
we affirm. ¶2 The parties agree that the operative test is set forth in State v. Perry, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265330 - 2020-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
). We affirm. ¶2 Regardless of whether Sain’s argument for testing is based on Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33003 - 2008-06-11
). We affirm. ¶2 Regardless of whether Sain’s argument for testing is based on Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33003 - 2008-06-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
Sain’s argument for testing is based on WIS. STAT. § 165.79 or on the due process standard discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33003 - 2014-09-15
Sain’s argument for testing is based on WIS. STAT. § 165.79 or on the due process standard discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33003 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher Gates
to establish probable cause. See id. Probable cause is a commonsense test based on what a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15437 - 2005-03-31
to establish probable cause. See id. Probable cause is a commonsense test based on what a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15437 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas M. Schottler
The test for whether counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge Schottler’s competency is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5794 - 2017-09-19
The test for whether counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge Schottler’s competency is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5794 - 2017-09-19
State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
is a question of fact that we review under the “clearly erroneous” test, and the latter is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5998 - 2005-03-31
is a question of fact that we review under the “clearly erroneous” test, and the latter is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5998 - 2005-03-31