Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18491 - 18500 of 29713 for des.
Search results 18491 - 18500 of 29713 for des.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter A. Paget
and after a de novo review conclude that misconduct occurred. We cannot do this because the present
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16552 - 2005-03-31
and after a de novo review conclude that misconduct occurred. We cannot do this because the present
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16552 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
they are clearly erroneous, and I review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901374 - 2025-01-16
they are clearly erroneous, and I review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901374 - 2025-01-16
COURT OF APPEALS
deference to the trial court’s conclusion. Id. Despite our de novo standard of review, we value the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63029 - 2011-04-26
deference to the trial court’s conclusion. Id. Despite our de novo standard of review, we value the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63029 - 2011-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but we decide de novo the legal questions of whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101482 - 2013-09-03
they are clearly erroneous, but we decide de novo the legal questions of whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101482 - 2013-09-03
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See Williams v. American Transm. Co., 2007 WI App 246, ¶5, 306 Wis. 2d 181, 742 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41821 - 2009-10-05
review de novo. See Williams v. American Transm. Co., 2007 WI App 246, ¶5, 306 Wis. 2d 181, 742 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41821 - 2009-10-05
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles in mind, we turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145914 - 2015-08-10
the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles in mind, we turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145914 - 2015-08-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226968 - 2018-11-13
for effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226968 - 2018-11-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court decides de novo. Id. ¶5 Our review of a claim that a defendant has been denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94664 - 2014-09-15
, which this court decides de novo. Id. ¶5 Our review of a claim that a defendant has been denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94664 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
review the claim de novo. See State v. Borhegyi, 222 Wis. 2d 506, 508, 588 N.W.2d 89 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50138 - 2014-09-15
review the claim de novo. See State v. Borhegyi, 222 Wis. 2d 506, 508, 588 N.W.2d 89 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50138 - 2014-09-15
State v. D. Weasler
court’s findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous, but decide the constitutional facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14936 - 2005-03-31
court’s findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous, but decide the constitutional facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14936 - 2005-03-31