Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1851 - 1860 of 95297 for Shawano County Case Search.

COURT OF APPEALS
to by the only witness at the suppression hearing in this case, Washington County Deputy Sheriff Eric Essinger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84134 - 2012-07-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows: WHEREAS, Eric Essinger has this day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84134 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 147
2009 WI APP 147 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1795
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40763 - 2014-09-15

2009 WI APP 147
2009 WI App 147 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1795 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40763 - 2009-10-27

[PDF] WI 130
the circumstances of this case, the search of the eyeglass case was a permissible search incident to the arrest
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35055 - 2014-09-15

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=04/02/2025&end_date=04/02/2025

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=04/23/2026&end_date=04/23/2026

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=02/21/2024&end_date=02/21/2024

State v. Wilton Tye
statement to support the search warrant in this case is a technical irregularity not affecting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17589 - 2005-03-31

State v. Nakia N. Hayes
. NETTESHEIM, J. This case concerns the validity of a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8280 - 2005-03-31