Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1851 - 1860 of 83228 for case search.
Search results 1851 - 1860 of 83228 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Ronnie L. Ringold
residence and supporting evidence of his involvement in the burglary was later recovered during a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7295 - 2017-09-20
residence and supporting evidence of his involvement in the burglary was later recovered during a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7295 - 2017-09-20
State v. Ahmad Abdullah
search of his home. We affirm. On the night of January 2, 1996, Milwaukee County police officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11544 - 2005-03-31
search of his home. We affirm. On the night of January 2, 1996, Milwaukee County police officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ahmad Abdullah
) and 161.41(1m)(h)(1), STATS. Abdullah challenges the warrantless search of his home. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11544 - 2017-09-19
) and 161.41(1m)(h)(1), STATS. Abdullah challenges the warrantless search of his home. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11544 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
by the State in this case [was] not a search warrant and thus, the attachment of a GPS device to [Pinder's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227193 - 2019-03-06
by the State in this case [was] not a search warrant and thus, the attachment of a GPS device to [Pinder's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227193 - 2019-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
to an unlawful warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2013-09-24
to an unlawful warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2013-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified to at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102150 - 2017-09-21
warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified to at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102150 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the search that he challenges, we affirm. ¶2 The charges against Cephus stemmed from a robbery of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74632 - 2014-09-15
to the search that he challenges, we affirm. ¶2 The charges against Cephus stemmed from a robbery of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74632 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that Cephus’ live-in girlfriend voluntarily consented to the search that he challenges, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74632 - 2011-12-06
that Cephus’ live-in girlfriend voluntarily consented to the search that he challenges, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74632 - 2011-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758891 - 2024-02-08
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758891 - 2024-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758891 - 2024-02-08
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758891 - 2024-02-08