Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1851 - 1860 of 3968 for davy.
Search results 1851 - 1860 of 3968 for davy.
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
2007AP001329 CR State v. Tracy T. Davis
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36493 - 2009-05-11
2007AP001329 CR State v. Tracy T. Davis
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36493 - 2009-05-11
Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
PDF Dec 23, 2025 2025AP000008-CRNM State v. Rayshawn Hakeem Davis 1 Milwaukee PDF Dec 23, 2025
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=12/23/2025&end_date=12/23/2025¬iceTypeCode=SMD
PDF Dec 23, 2025 2025AP000008-CRNM State v. Rayshawn Hakeem Davis 1 Milwaukee PDF Dec 23, 2025
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=12/23/2025&end_date=12/23/2025¬iceTypeCode=SMD
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
CHIPS or failure to assume parental responsibility. The testimony of Antoinette Davis established
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108300 - 2017-09-21
CHIPS or failure to assume parental responsibility. The testimony of Antoinette Davis established
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108300 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Davis, 2008 WI 71, ΒΆ18, 310 Wis. 2d 583, 751 N.W.2d 332 (questions of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64697 - 2014-09-15
. Davis, 2008 WI 71, ΒΆ18, 310 Wis. 2d 583, 751 N.W.2d 332 (questions of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64697 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel D. Brown
an ambiguous statement. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459 (1994). Instead, he argues that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2490 - 2005-03-31
an ambiguous statement. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459 (1994). Instead, he argues that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2490 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 24
., and Davis, J. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348669 - 2021-05-10
., and Davis, J. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348669 - 2021-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MEL FLANAGAN and CYNTHIA MAE DAVIS, Judges. Judgment modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249233 - 2019-10-30
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MEL FLANAGAN and CYNTHIA MAE DAVIS, Judges. Judgment modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249233 - 2019-10-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the determination of witness competency is a matter of trial court discretion, see State v. Davis, 66 Wis. 2d 636
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=313002 - 2020-12-15
that the determination of witness competency is a matter of trial court discretion, see State v. Davis, 66 Wis. 2d 636
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=313002 - 2020-12-15
Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. J. Gerard Hogan
the United States Supreme Court's decision in Davis v. Michigan Dep't of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803 (1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8643 - 2005-03-31
the United States Supreme Court's decision in Davis v. Michigan Dep't of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803 (1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8643 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 48
Argument: May 17, 2021 JUDGES: Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Concurred: Dissented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382518 - 2021-08-19
Argument: May 17, 2021 JUDGES: Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Concurred: Dissented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382518 - 2021-08-19