Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1851 - 1860 of 2567 for dnr.

COURT OF APPEALS
this as an implicit concession that Schutz is correct on these points. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322-23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33562 - 2008-07-30

[PDF] Catharine M. Lawton v. Town of Barton
of a motion to dismiss. Turkow v. DNR, 216 Wis. 2d 273, 280, 576 N.W.2d 288 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7364 - 2017-09-20

George T. Stathus v. James H. Horst
be applied consistent with their plain meaning. DNR v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co. 108 Wis. 2d 403, 408, 321
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2468 - 2005-03-31

Bruce D. Golembiewski v. City of Milwaukee
subsequent judicial review. See Omernick v. DNR, 100 Wis.2d 234, 248, 301 N.W.2d 437, 444 (1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14380 - 2005-03-31

Sherri Korntved v. Advanced Healthcare
of material fact.” Baxter v. DNR, 165 Wis. 2d 298, 312, 477 N.W.2d 648 (Ct. App. 1991) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19040 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] Susan Dudacek v. Daniel G. Hovland
is designed to prevent. Baxter v. DNR, 165 Wis.2d 298, 312, 477 N.W.2d 648, 654 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12319 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Donivan Molitor v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
, however, we review the agency’s decision, not the trial court’s. See Sterlingworth Condo. Ass’n v. DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3053 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] The Estate of Theresa E. Lyons v. CNA Insurance Companies
does not contest the verity of these letters, see Kosmatka v. DNR, 77 Wis.2d 558, 564, 253 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10066 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, not the circuit court.” Lake Beulah Mgmt. Dist. v. DNR, 2011 WI 54, ¶25, 335 Wis. 2d 47, 799 N.W.2d 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963127 - 2025-06-03

[PDF] Kenneth J. Murray v. City of Milwaukee
reply brief. We therefore take this as a concession. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3493 - 2017-09-20