Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1851 - 1860 of 58532 for speedy trial.
Search results 1851 - 1860 of 58532 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33862 - 2014-11-17
that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33862 - 2014-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial court’s objective bias denied him of his constitutional right to a fair trial and that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762884 - 2024-02-13
trial court’s objective bias denied him of his constitutional right to a fair trial and that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762884 - 2024-02-13
State v. David E. Rusch
for a new trial. He contends on appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11527 - 2013-05-07
for a new trial. He contends on appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11527 - 2013-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it purportedly failed to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28072 - 2007-02-12
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it purportedly failed to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28072 - 2007-02-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentencing relief. The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28072 - 2014-09-15
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentencing relief. The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28072 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Pratt argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the misjoinder or move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134783 - 2017-09-21
Pratt argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the misjoinder or move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134783 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in 2010, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Pratt argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134783 - 2015-02-10
in 2010, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Pratt argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134783 - 2015-02-10
Chavis J. Sheriff v. Edwardo G. Arellano, M.D.
, they challenge the trial court's evidentiary and discovery rulings and contend that the trial judge failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7869 - 2005-03-31
, they challenge the trial court's evidentiary and discovery rulings and contend that the trial judge failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7869 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Chavis J. Sheriff v. Edwardo G. Arellano, M.D.
a judgment dismissing their medical malpractice claims. On appeal, they challenge the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7869 - 2017-09-19
a judgment dismissing their medical malpractice claims. On appeal, they challenge the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7869 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, following a jury trial, for armed robbery and first-degree recklessly endangering safety, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260107 - 2020-05-12
of conviction, following a jury trial, for armed robbery and first-degree recklessly endangering safety, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260107 - 2020-05-12